2018/2/15 The order was set aside by the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 6725/2008 dated 19.11.2008), and confining the definition of "mine" as defined vide explanation (b) to احصل على السعر
12. On 11.12.2018, after the Supreme Court remand, the NGT passed a fresh order disposing of the O.A. No. 332/2017 whereby the onus was shifted to the State Government to assess the احصل على السعر
judgment. This direction is against 343 identified stone crusher units, as mentioned in the report of the Joint Committee dated 17th January, 2023. Further direction issued by the Tribunal is that احصل على السعر
53. As noted above both the State of Uttarakhand and State of U.P. have challenged the judgment of Uttarakhand High Court. Shri Dinesh Dwivedi, learned senior counsel questioning احصل على السعر
1992/5/15 No stone crusher shall operate in the above said area form August 15, 1992 onward. (3) The writ petitions filed by the owners/proprietors of stone crushers in Delhi High احصل على السعر
Himachal Pradesh High Court M/S Lakhwinder Sigh Stone Crushers vs . Uoi Ors. on 7 November, 2023 Bench: Mamidanna Satya Ratna Sri Ramachandra Rao, Jyotsna Rewal Dua احصل على السعر
2022/3/24 Mahaveer Stone Crushing Co. v. Tata Motors Ltd. March 24, 2022. Civil Appeal No (s). 6730/2010. 1. This appeal is carried against the order dated 19.05.2009 passed by the احصل على السعر
R.P Sethi, J. — In pursuance to the directions given by the Supreme Court in M.C Mehta v.Union of India and other, (1992) 3 SCC 256, Government of Haryana issued notification dated احصل على السعر
2022/3/24 1. This appeal is carried against the order dated 19.05.2009 passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi, dismissing the revision احصل على السعر
2018/2/15 The order was set aside by the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 6725/2008 dated 19.11.2008), and confining the definition of "mine" as defined vide explanation (b) to احصل على السعر
No stone crusher shall operate in the above said area form August 15, 1992 onward. (3) The writ petitions filed by the owners/proprietors of stone crushers in Delhi High Court which have been احصل على السعر
Get free access to the complete judgment in Bandhua Mukti Morcha v. ... 1948 is applicable to the workmen employed in the stone quarries. The Supreme Court can appoint any commission or احصل على السعر
Karnataka High Court M/S Shree Maruthi Stone Crushers vs State Of Karnataka on 9 September, 2020 Author: Abhay S. Oka Bench: Abhay S. Oka ... Further, we would also like to place احصل على السعر
2022/5/20 O R D E R. 1 The grievance of the appellants is that the impugned order of the National Green Tribunal 1 dated 12 April 2022 issuing an ad interim direction that the stone احصل على السعر
A letter addressed to the Supreme Court of India complained about the prevalence of bonded labour system in Cutton, Anangpur and Lakkarpur areas of Faridabad District in Haryana احصل على السعر
Supreme Court Judgements/ Orders • Supreme Court stays the operation of office memorandums issued by central government that allowed grant of ex post facto environmental clearance • احصل على السعر
Get Solution Price Right Now! leave your message here, we'll send you an Email immediately. * *احصل على السعر
2016/2/10 Kumaon Stone Crusher (S). Supreme Court Of India Feb 10, 2016; Subsequent References; CaseIQ (AI Recommendations) State Of Uttaranchal Petitioner(S) v. Kumaon احصل على السعر
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS. CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 6730/2010Mahaveer Stone Crushing Co..Appellant(s)VersusTata Motors احصل على السعر
Latest Judgments State of Uttaranchal Ors. v. M/s. Kumaon Stone Crusher. February 19, 2015. Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 19445/2004. Shri S.R. Singh, learned senior احصل على السعر
Latest Judgments State of Uttaranchal Ors. v. M/s. Kumaon Stone Crusher. November 26, 2021. Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 19445/2004. Learned counsel for the احصل على السعر
2016/2/10 Kumaon Stone Crusher (S). Supreme Court Of India Feb 10, 2016; Subsequent References; CaseIQ (AI Recommendations) State Of Uttaranchal Petitioner(S) v. Kumaon احصل على السعر
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS. CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 6730/2010Mahaveer Stone Crushing Co..Appellant(s)VersusTata Motors احصل على السعر
Latest Judgments State of Uttaranchal Ors. v. M/s. Kumaon Stone Crusher. February 19, 2015. Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 19445/2004. Shri S.R. Singh, learned senior احصل على السعر
Latest Judgments State of Uttaranchal Ors. v. M/s. Kumaon Stone Crusher. November 26, 2021. Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 19445/2004. Learned counsel for the احصل على السعر
The observation of the Supreme Court cannot be termed to be 'obiter dicta' since the Supreme Court has held that the process of concrete by stone crushers is a manufacturing process. احصل على السعر
2022/2/28 O R D E R. Leave granted. The challenge in the present appeal is to an order passed by the High Court of Karnataka on 18.08.2021 whereby the writ petition claiming a writ احصل على السعر
The petitioners stone crushers have no storage licence under 2002 Rules and hence, they cannot carry their operations. No stone crushers can carry its operation without storage licence. The احصل على السعر
2024/9/2 The Supreme Court, in a judgment authored by Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah, emphasised the adverse effects of illegal power crushers on the environment and health of the احصل على السعر
2021/4/2 Get free access to the complete judgment in THE STATE OF HARYANA v. M/S KC STONE CRUSHING CO. on CaseMine.احصل على السعر
All the writ petitioners supported the judgment of Uttarakhand High Court dated 01.07.2004 in M/s Kumaon Stone Crusher wherein, the High Court has held that no levy of Transit Fee can be احصل على السعر
2008/7/10 (1) The order passed in writ petition no. 5768/2008 (m/s, anu stone crusher v. Bank of india and others) will also govern the disposal of wrti petition no. 5770/2008 (M/s. احصل على السعر
2010/8/17 The grievance of the petitioners is that the State Government of Uttarakhand cannot force the petitioners to obtain transit pass and to pay transit fee in terms of Rules 1978 احصل على السعر
Appellants sought closure/re-location of stone crushers due to environmental violations. After Supreme Court remand, NGT passed a fresh order disposing of the O.A. No. 332/2017; State احصل على السعر
2021/2/4 However, in the said judgement passed by Supreme Court, there is no reference and no discussion in respect of any bar to release of vehicles on superdari. Order dt. 7.5.2019 احصل على السعر